<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: linux users are all crazy fundamentalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/</link>
	<description>one man's dawning realization that linux is waaaaay smarter than he is</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sssss</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7197</link>
		<dc:creator>sssss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7197</guid>
		<description>Sorry to say this but¿ you are right. I am  Linux user myself. And had this kind  of coemmnts whne I was starting.

The chatroom are not generally a good way of find help more are just teen flammers or angry people

You should vivist some forums very distro has their own forum generally.

The distro you choose depende of your needs and taste . If you rae starting. there is some lerning curve

Some distros like Suse , Mandriva, Ubuntu, PC los are good distros to start since are more user firnedly

Once that learn a bit more you can try Gentoo, Fedora, slackware, Debian : this dttros are more manual so for beginner a I dont knwo r you xperice  are a bit difficult whne it staring once you leran you will find them more easy.

And dont let this trolls confuse you. Choose the distro you are really like. And leave this thing stop you. trolls are evry every where even on windows communities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to say this but¿ you are right. I am  Linux user myself. And had this kind  of coemmnts whne I was starting.</p>
<p>The chatroom are not generally a good way of find help more are just teen flammers or angry people</p>
<p>You should vivist some forums very distro has their own forum generally.</p>
<p>The distro you choose depende of your needs and taste . If you rae starting. there is some lerning curve</p>
<p>Some distros like Suse , Mandriva, Ubuntu, PC los are good distros to start since are more user firnedly</p>
<p>Once that learn a bit more you can try Gentoo, Fedora, slackware, Debian : this dttros are more manual so for beginner a I dont knwo r you xperice  are a bit difficult whne it staring once you leran you will find them more easy.</p>
<p>And dont let this trolls confuse you. Choose the distro you are really like. And leave this thing stop you. trolls are evry every where even on windows communities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raskolnikov</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7196</link>
		<dc:creator>Raskolnikov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7196</guid>
		<description>Please, whatever you decide, stop writing these stupid articles.  

And for the love of God people please stop submitting this dumb shit to SumbleUpon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, whatever you decide, stop writing these stupid articles.  </p>
<p>And for the love of God people please stop submitting this dumb shit to SumbleUpon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil1dwk</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7098</link>
		<dc:creator>evil1dwk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 02:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7098</guid>
		<description>If you knew of something you thought was pretty cool or even really cool and someone was giving it away. You'd get a little passionate about it yourself.

Anyway my suggestions on distros.

Centos - good server base easy install. If you want a lamp it's an easy way to go. Stable as hell. Yeah they are associated with redhat in that they are giving away what redhat sells.

Fedora - pretty much the same as cent. It's just not RHEL  (redhat enterprise linux). Good stable base for any LAMP server.

Gentoo - this one I haven't tried myself. I can't give much input.

Ubuntu - Debian made a little prettier a little easier and well documented. When reading through the endless documentation pay attention to version. Something documented for gutsy may not work on other releases. Not a bad OS for a windows convert. I use it on a couple laptops my kids use.

Debian - stable with a large core base of users. Like you said the developers all have to have real jobs and find it hard to always document projects. I think the ubuntu bitterness stems from not coming up with the idea themselves because they wanted to stay completely true to opensource. Debian could have built the same business model while maintaining their credibility in the opensource community if they really tried.

There are literally hundreds of releases available. You may even find a distro specifically compiled to preform the functions you are looking. Some with live CDs to test before actually installing. Have a spare computer with lots of hard drive space try freenas or openfiler. Have a computer you want to hook to a TV try freevo or mythdora or mythbuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you knew of something you thought was pretty cool or even really cool and someone was giving it away. You&#8217;d get a little passionate about it yourself.</p>
<p>Anyway my suggestions on distros.</p>
<p>Centos - good server base easy install. If you want a lamp it&#8217;s an easy way to go. Stable as hell. Yeah they are associated with redhat in that they are giving away what redhat sells.</p>
<p>Fedora - pretty much the same as cent. It&#8217;s just not RHEL  (redhat enterprise linux). Good stable base for any LAMP server.</p>
<p>Gentoo - this one I haven&#8217;t tried myself. I can&#8217;t give much input.</p>
<p>Ubuntu - Debian made a little prettier a little easier and well documented. When reading through the endless documentation pay attention to version. Something documented for gutsy may not work on other releases. Not a bad OS for a windows convert. I use it on a couple laptops my kids use.</p>
<p>Debian - stable with a large core base of users. Like you said the developers all have to have real jobs and find it hard to always document projects. I think the ubuntu bitterness stems from not coming up with the idea themselves because they wanted to stay completely true to opensource. Debian could have built the same business model while maintaining their credibility in the opensource community if they really tried.</p>
<p>There are literally hundreds of releases available. You may even find a distro specifically compiled to preform the functions you are looking. Some with live CDs to test before actually installing. Have a spare computer with lots of hard drive space try freenas or openfiler. Have a computer you want to hook to a TV try freevo or mythdora or mythbuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Reeves</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7096</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Reeves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-7096</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. Loved the insight and humor. Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. Loved the insight and humor. Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-6943</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 05:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-6943</guid>
		<description>Whenever I start feeling like I'm beginning to lose it, I steer towards these forums, whereupon, in short order after scanning these rants, I feel miraculously cured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I start feeling like I&#8217;m beginning to lose it, I steer towards these forums, whereupon, in short order after scanning these rants, I feel miraculously cured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>I've always found this debate quite funny. Having been using UNIX style operating systems since there was still AT&#38;T Unix, I can tell you with 100% certainty: All linux "distros" are different wrapping on the same box. The linux kernel is what defines a linux machine at core. Everything else is just packaging. Differences being what one group of wahoos decide is a good idea VS what another group of wahoos think. People for some reason want to look at Debian as a different OS from Gentoo, Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS (And while I'm on the subject of CentOS, the writer of this article needs a little less cranial anal submursion if he cant understand that all they do is compile the required publicly available source code for RedHat's RHEL into their own package, rebrand it CentOS and that they are NOT infact affiliated with RH) Mandriva, DSL, etc. It isnt. Its the same shit. It boils down to which one you want to start off with. If you're an end user with the typical understanding of computers as the general populous here in the US, dont use linux; you probably wont get it. (This is because linux is designed solely by what are playfully called "geeks". They have no interest nor motivation to provide a product that non-technical people can understand and use reasonably. Microsoft and Apple have marketing teams and what not who will demand their product appeal to these people since they make up the majority of the population, thus a larger revenue source to tap.)
In conclusion, I would agree that the linux community is turning rapidly into the same variety of people who use Mac's - Blinded by their own bullshit - and devout to it as if it were made by god himself. 
If you want a LAMP server, put that in google and pick the first link. If that sucks, try the second. Keep on doing this until you get one that doesnt. Linux distros are a dime a dozen, and most will work for the given funciton outlined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always found this debate quite funny. Having been using UNIX style operating systems since there was still AT&amp;T Unix, I can tell you with 100% certainty: All linux &#8220;distros&#8221; are different wrapping on the same box. The linux kernel is what defines a linux machine at core. Everything else is just packaging. Differences being what one group of wahoos decide is a good idea VS what another group of wahoos think. People for some reason want to look at Debian as a different OS from Gentoo, Ubuntu, Fedora, CentOS (And while I&#8217;m on the subject of CentOS, the writer of this article needs a little less cranial anal submursion if he cant understand that all they do is compile the required publicly available source code for RedHat&#8217;s RHEL into their own package, rebrand it CentOS and that they are NOT infact affiliated with RH) Mandriva, DSL, etc. It isnt. Its the same shit. It boils down to which one you want to start off with. If you&#8217;re an end user with the typical understanding of computers as the general populous here in the US, dont use linux; you probably wont get it. (This is because linux is designed solely by what are playfully called &#8220;geeks&#8221;. They have no interest nor motivation to provide a product that non-technical people can understand and use reasonably. Microsoft and Apple have marketing teams and what not who will demand their product appeal to these people since they make up the majority of the population, thus a larger revenue source to tap.)<br />
In conclusion, I would agree that the linux community is turning rapidly into the same variety of people who use Mac&#8217;s - Blinded by their own bullshit - and devout to it as if it were made by god himself.<br />
If you want a LAMP server, put that in google and pick the first link. If that sucks, try the second. Keep on doing this until you get one that doesnt. Linux distros are a dime a dozen, and most will work for the given funciton outlined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youareallcrazyassshitters</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-3959</link>
		<dc:creator>youareallcrazyassshitters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-3959</guid>
		<description>Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>Fedora w/ Livna to put the "illegal" stuff on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fedora w/ Livna to put the &#8220;illegal&#8221; stuff on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-2656</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-2656</guid>
		<description>ha ha ha ha haaaa!!! ohh my.. that is funny ha haaaa :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha ha ha haaaa!!! ohh my.. that is funny ha haaaa :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Klassen</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Klassen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with the sentiment that Linux users can get a bit over the top with their choice of operating system. In the end it's about the package manager and file system layout. If you're hosting with it, the pretty stuff doesn't matter too often. I'll put my vote in for Ubuntu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with the sentiment that Linux users can get a bit over the top with their choice of operating system. In the end it&#8217;s about the package manager and file system layout. If you&#8217;re hosting with it, the pretty stuff doesn&#8217;t matter too often. I&#8217;ll put my vote in for Ubuntu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staples</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Staples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>'Oh, hooray, I not only have to build the website myself, now I have to handcode the damn OS too.'

In what way do you handcode your OS by installing gentoo?
Makes me wonder if you really spent more than 5 minutes looking at each distribution?

modifying configuration files and specifying which packages you want on your system is hardly "handcoding" an OS.

'Why can’t someone just say, “Debian is designed around this idea, Ubuntu around this idea, Fedora does this really well, but Gentoo is better at this.”'

Each of these distros' websites briefly explain the underlying concepts and ideas for that distribution.

NOBODY is going to agree that one specific distribution does a general task (such as hosting your website) better than any other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Oh, hooray, I not only have to build the website myself, now I have to handcode the damn OS too.&#8217;</p>
<p>In what way do you handcode your OS by installing gentoo?<br />
Makes me wonder if you really spent more than 5 minutes looking at each distribution?</p>
<p>modifying configuration files and specifying which packages you want on your system is hardly &#8220;handcoding&#8221; an OS.</p>
<p>&#8216;Why can’t someone just say, “Debian is designed around this idea, Ubuntu around this idea, Fedora does this really well, but Gentoo is better at this.”&#8217;</p>
<p>Each of these distros&#8217; websites briefly explain the underlying concepts and ideas for that distribution.</p>
<p>NOBODY is going to agree that one specific distribution does a general task (such as hosting your website) better than any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>One word: 

FreeBSD ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One word: </p>
<p>FreeBSD ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: command line idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>command line idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>I've responded to Nick and others in this post:

http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/why-i-wrote-that-post/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve responded to Nick and others in this post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/why-i-wrote-that-post/" rel="nofollow">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/why-i-wrote-that-post/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: command line idiot &#187; Why I Wrote *that post*</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>command line idiot &#187; Why I Wrote *that post*</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] linux users are all crazy fundamentalistsapache2, php5, phpmyadminShared Hosting is Awesome!if at first you don't succeed, blow it upBack from Italy! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] linux users are all crazy fundamentalistsapache2, php5, phpmyadminShared Hosting is Awesome!if at first you don&#8217;t succeed, blow it upBack from Italy! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of whacko pansies. Everything he said has merit. Linux users complain about Windows. Crappy this, crappy that. If you want to take over the world, you make it as easy as possible for the masses to follow you. So it would make sense to have a distro be as easy as friggin possible to install and use "straight out of the box". That being said, I don't like computers. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of whacko pansies. Everything he said has merit. Linux users complain about Windows. Crappy this, crappy that. If you want to take over the world, you make it as easy as possible for the masses to follow you. So it would make sense to have a distro be as easy as friggin possible to install and use &#8220;straight out of the box&#8221;. That being said, I don&#8217;t like computers. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D. Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>James D. Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I think that Nick is wholly correct in his "zealotry" and his irritation. There is an ideological difference in the world between the people who want things done for them, and the people who want help in doing things for themselves. If it were not an idealogical difference that a great many people take very seriously, they wouldn't have had the conviction to spend the last several years developing billions of dollars worth of free software to leave laying around on the web.

Microsoft has a vested interest in your remaining stupid -- they want to be the default option, which means they don't want you to make choices. Of course you pay for that -- both with the upgrades, and with the licensing fees of all of the proprietary software you would have to purchase to run a decent Windows system (assuming there weren't people out there making things available for you either through free software or piracy.)

If you don't appreciate his zealotry, it's either because you haven't thought about the fact that you would have less of everything (and by a significant margin) -- music, media, web-content -- where would you be if you had to pay an access fee for every video on you-tube? That is the Microsoft model, or the Metallica model. Every one of those You-Tube videos is intellectual property -- you want to watch, you have to pay. You want a membership at Myspace or Facebook? You have to pay.

Or maybe you are just so wealthy that you don't care, and living in a world where only the wealthy who can afford the thousands of dollars for director, and photoshop, and office and acrobat get to participate in the discussion is OK with you. Either way, your position is implicitly idealogical, and implicitly disenfranchises others.

So before you get all shitty about why Open Source people don't suck your dick when you call, like proprietary help desk people after you purchase the gold level service agreement, stop and ask yourself "What have I given back to deserve the attention of this community at all?" Because at that point, before the conversation has even started, they have already given you a tremendous amount out of simple respect for your humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Nick is wholly correct in his &#8220;zealotry&#8221; and his irritation. There is an ideological difference in the world between the people who want things done for them, and the people who want help in doing things for themselves. If it were not an idealogical difference that a great many people take very seriously, they wouldn&#8217;t have had the conviction to spend the last several years developing billions of dollars worth of free software to leave laying around on the web.</p>
<p>Microsoft has a vested interest in your remaining stupid &#8212; they want to be the default option, which means they don&#8217;t want you to make choices. Of course you pay for that &#8212; both with the upgrades, and with the licensing fees of all of the proprietary software you would have to purchase to run a decent Windows system (assuming there weren&#8217;t people out there making things available for you either through free software or piracy.)</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t appreciate his zealotry, it&#8217;s either because you haven&#8217;t thought about the fact that you would have less of everything (and by a significant margin) &#8212; music, media, web-content &#8212; where would you be if you had to pay an access fee for every video on you-tube? That is the Microsoft model, or the Metallica model. Every one of those You-Tube videos is intellectual property &#8212; you want to watch, you have to pay. You want a membership at Myspace or Facebook? You have to pay.</p>
<p>Or maybe you are just so wealthy that you don&#8217;t care, and living in a world where only the wealthy who can afford the thousands of dollars for director, and photoshop, and office and acrobat get to participate in the discussion is OK with you. Either way, your position is implicitly idealogical, and implicitly disenfranchises others.</p>
<p>So before you get all shitty about why Open Source people don&#8217;t suck your dick when you call, like proprietary help desk people after you purchase the gold level service agreement, stop and ask yourself &#8220;What have I given back to deserve the attention of this community at all?&#8221; Because at that point, before the conversation has even started, they have already given you a tremendous amount out of simple respect for your humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deborah</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>deborah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I'm a bit surprised you didn't try OpenSUSE, which someone should have recommended for putting together a server. Aside from that, you pretty much covered the biggies in a very general way. Ubuntu *is* pretty (and Sabayon's even prettier), incredibly quick to install, but it's designed to be a desktop O/S for grandma, not the LAMP server you're looking to build (there is a server edition, but I don't know any systems administrators using it in a production environment). While, yes, any Linux distro will do what you want if you beat on it hard enough, there are flavors more oriented towards this kind of use. Folks maintaining servers are probably running RedHat or SUSE, typically headless (i.e., no monitor, no desktop). Personally, I'm running SUSE for my LAMP+ web servers. I find it very easy to install and manage (using the Yast "control panel"). It comes with Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus PostgreSQL, Ruby, Tomcat, and a wide variety of other development tools, languages, and other software packages I or my users want for developing web sites. I recommend talking to actual Linux systems administrators, web admins, and other folks who make a living doing what you want to do... that will help you focus on the right three or four flavors out of that frighteningly comprehensive list on Wikipedia (start by throwing out any distro that doesn't have "server" in the "Purpose" column), and find the one you find easiest and most useful. I recommending recommend the biggies, SUSE and RedHat, but given that Ubuntu desktop is so quick and easy to install, you might try Ubuntu Server Edition, offers automatic LAMP setup. Both SUSE and RedHat have large user bases of professional server administrators, and you'll find plentiful documentation, support forums, and related information online.

btw, very cute article -- us Linux Evangelists should try to take an objective look at ourselves more often. Personally, I've "disconnected" from many online and in-person discussions of flavors that quickly turned into raging battles... it's more tiresome than the Mac vs. Windows debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit surprised you didn&#8217;t try OpenSUSE, which someone should have recommended for putting together a server. Aside from that, you pretty much covered the biggies in a very general way. Ubuntu *is* pretty (and Sabayon&#8217;s even prettier), incredibly quick to install, but it&#8217;s designed to be a desktop O/S for grandma, not the LAMP server you&#8217;re looking to build (there is a server edition, but I don&#8217;t know any systems administrators using it in a production environment). While, yes, any Linux distro will do what you want if you beat on it hard enough, there are flavors more oriented towards this kind of use. Folks maintaining servers are probably running RedHat or SUSE, typically headless (i.e., no monitor, no desktop). Personally, I&#8217;m running SUSE for my LAMP+ web servers. I find it very easy to install and manage (using the Yast &#8220;control panel&#8221;). It comes with Apache, MySQL, PHP, plus PostgreSQL, Ruby, Tomcat, and a wide variety of other development tools, languages, and other software packages I or my users want for developing web sites. I recommend talking to actual Linux systems administrators, web admins, and other folks who make a living doing what you want to do&#8230; that will help you focus on the right three or four flavors out of that frighteningly comprehensive list on Wikipedia (start by throwing out any distro that doesn&#8217;t have &#8220;server&#8221; in the &#8220;Purpose&#8221; column), and find the one you find easiest and most useful. I recommending recommend the biggies, SUSE and RedHat, but given that Ubuntu desktop is so quick and easy to install, you might try Ubuntu Server Edition, offers automatic LAMP setup. Both SUSE and RedHat have large user bases of professional server administrators, and you&#8217;ll find plentiful documentation, support forums, and related information online.</p>
<p>btw, very cute article &#8212; us Linux Evangelists should try to take an objective look at ourselves more often. Personally, I&#8217;ve &#8220;disconnected&#8221; from many online and in-person discussions of flavors that quickly turned into raging battles&#8230; it&#8217;s more tiresome than the Mac vs. Windows debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter willis</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>peter willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 06:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>One of the greatest struggles involved with being a creative songwriter/musician/producer is the time and effort that it takes in understanding the technologies that enable us to create. It's quite simple to sit down at a piano or pick up a guitar and have a song cranked out in an hour or so but, to sit down at your favorite DAW is going to take you a hell of a lot longer. especially, if you don't know the difference between how your DAW works from how your car functions. I'm speaking of this in musical terms because that's how I can relate to developers or programmers. 

Right in the middle of creative flow, while laying down an awesome keyboard part I get some ridiculous and intrusive message with code - like numbers and letters which mean absolutely nothing to me other than, my performance is ruined, I have to stop, read a manual, and become frustrated as hell as to why this damn thing just can't work so I can make a record and get on with it. 

Apple came a long way in simplifying the user interface of computers for those of us who didn't know what a DOS file was. It became so obvious that we all want a simpler method to input data, that Microsoft followed suit and came up with their answer to the Mac by releasing Windows. People want to have a visual concept of what something does and they do not want to read a manual 900 pages long to figure out how to record a piano. this is called intuitive design. if only life were actually this simple.

Again, Apple came to the rescue and designed GarageBand: a recording system that, just  by taking a close look at, pressing a few buttons and, exploring the menu options, is almost a no brainer to operate. While it may not be the ultimate piece of software for industry pro's, THEY ARE GETTING THE IDEA. Logic Pro was then re-released and cleaned up considerably so that we knew instinctively how to operate it. This is certainly becoming an industry standard now very quickly, I might add. Although Apple's market share is decisively less than it's competitor, the adaptation that Microsoft made has worked out undeniably in their favor. People want SIMPLE. 

Enter Linux and Ubuntu, taking personal computing back to the dark ages. Whist open source is a great idea and in many ways seems so altruistic in its endeavors, it's still quite obviously geek speak and, geeks do not, IMHO, know how to communicate to anyone other than themselves. This makes support a major inconvenience. When I have a problem with something and humble myself to seek the knowledge of a real pro, the last thing I want to be told is "click, click, google" or "search the database and you will find 700 articles on your problem". WTF has time to read through 700 articles in order to find what I'm looking for written by geeks in a coded language? I mean really guys. You've got to get more and socialize just to see how messed up your communication skills really are. 

Face it boys and girls, it's an enduser world out there and the majority of endusers don't know kaka about php, html, or mysql is. We think Flask files are the racks that chicks flash us on the 101 freeway on Flash Friday's and that Linux, is that dirty little boy that everyone laughs at on Charlie Brown. The day that geek speak is written in English and can be deciphered by my Dad is the day that the Internet and computers will really see it's full potential.

Thanks for letting me air it out. My 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the greatest struggles involved with being a creative songwriter/musician/producer is the time and effort that it takes in understanding the technologies that enable us to create. It&#8217;s quite simple to sit down at a piano or pick up a guitar and have a song cranked out in an hour or so but, to sit down at your favorite DAW is going to take you a hell of a lot longer. especially, if you don&#8217;t know the difference between how your DAW works from how your car functions. I&#8217;m speaking of this in musical terms because that&#8217;s how I can relate to developers or programmers. </p>
<p>Right in the middle of creative flow, while laying down an awesome keyboard part I get some ridiculous and intrusive message with code - like numbers and letters which mean absolutely nothing to me other than, my performance is ruined, I have to stop, read a manual, and become frustrated as hell as to why this damn thing just can&#8217;t work so I can make a record and get on with it. </p>
<p>Apple came a long way in simplifying the user interface of computers for those of us who didn&#8217;t know what a DOS file was. It became so obvious that we all want a simpler method to input data, that Microsoft followed suit and came up with their answer to the Mac by releasing Windows. People want to have a visual concept of what something does and they do not want to read a manual 900 pages long to figure out how to record a piano. this is called intuitive design. if only life were actually this simple.</p>
<p>Again, Apple came to the rescue and designed GarageBand: a recording system that, just  by taking a close look at, pressing a few buttons and, exploring the menu options, is almost a no brainer to operate. While it may not be the ultimate piece of software for industry pro&#8217;s, THEY ARE GETTING THE IDEA. Logic Pro was then re-released and cleaned up considerably so that we knew instinctively how to operate it. This is certainly becoming an industry standard now very quickly, I might add. Although Apple&#8217;s market share is decisively less than it&#8217;s competitor, the adaptation that Microsoft made has worked out undeniably in their favor. People want SIMPLE. </p>
<p>Enter Linux and Ubuntu, taking personal computing back to the dark ages. Whist open source is a great idea and in many ways seems so altruistic in its endeavors, it&#8217;s still quite obviously geek speak and, geeks do not, IMHO, know how to communicate to anyone other than themselves. This makes support a major inconvenience. When I have a problem with something and humble myself to seek the knowledge of a real pro, the last thing I want to be told is &#8220;click, click, google&#8221; or &#8220;search the database and you will find 700 articles on your problem&#8221;. WTF has time to read through 700 articles in order to find what I&#8217;m looking for written by geeks in a coded language? I mean really guys. You&#8217;ve got to get more and socialize just to see how messed up your communication skills really are. </p>
<p>Face it boys and girls, it&#8217;s an enduser world out there and the majority of endusers don&#8217;t know kaka about php, html, or mysql is. We think Flask files are the racks that chicks flash us on the 101 freeway on Flash Friday&#8217;s and that Linux, is that dirty little boy that everyone laughs at on Charlie Brown. The day that geek speak is written in English and can be deciphered by my Dad is the day that the Internet and computers will really see it&#8217;s full potential.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me air it out. My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I've been using Ubuntu for about two months now. So far, I like it. But I mainly only use it because I'm programming. Ubuntu and probably every other Linux has massive support for programmers. 
I tried to get Gentoo to install, but their manual is written for people who already know Linux fairly well. I may try again in another year, once I've gotten a lot more familiar with stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Ubuntu for about two months now. So far, I like it. But I mainly only use it because I&#8217;m programming. Ubuntu and probably every other Linux has massive support for programmers.<br />
I tried to get Gentoo to install, but their manual is written for people who already know Linux fairly well. I may try again in another year, once I&#8217;ve gotten a lot more familiar with stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DGM</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>DGM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu gets most of the stability from its Debian base, but has a much friendlier community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu gets most of the stability from its Debian base, but has a much friendlier community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harlem</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Harlem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Ok, ok so my Hyundai has a spoiler (whale tail).  Still savin up for those nasty hubcaps that spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, ok so my Hyundai has a spoiler (whale tail).  Still savin up for those nasty hubcaps that spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>You do realize that the reason CentOS claims not be affiliated with RedHat because RedHat specifically asked them not to... with lawyers and stuff.
And also, more importantly because they aren't.

The CentOS project compiles the sources (which are by law, freely available) of Redhat, which in its compiled form, is quite expensive; takes all the Redhat logos, names and other trademarks and then provides the fully compiled ready to go form of said sources to the public for free. 

Naturally Redhat doesn't like people knowing they can get the same software that they sell for free from another place, so they took legal action and now CentOS can no longer reference any names or trademarks of Redhat and now refer to it as 'A Prominent North American Enterprise Linux Vendor' 

While the fedora project is similar, and also sponsored by Redhat, its not updated as often, and doesn't have much in the way of support.

Do some research before attempting sarcasm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize that the reason CentOS claims not be affiliated with RedHat because RedHat specifically asked them not to&#8230; with lawyers and stuff.<br />
And also, more importantly because they aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The CentOS project compiles the sources (which are by law, freely available) of Redhat, which in its compiled form, is quite expensive; takes all the Redhat logos, names and other trademarks and then provides the fully compiled ready to go form of said sources to the public for free. </p>
<p>Naturally Redhat doesn&#8217;t like people knowing they can get the same software that they sell for free from another place, so they took legal action and now CentOS can no longer reference any names or trademarks of Redhat and now refer to it as &#8216;A Prominent North American Enterprise Linux Vendor&#8217; </p>
<p>While the fedora project is similar, and also sponsored by Redhat, its not updated as often, and doesn&#8217;t have much in the way of support.</p>
<p>Do some research before attempting sarcasm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chakkerz</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>chakkerz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>:) you forgot distro  which is teh b3st3r3st evva 4real!!

truly amazing how protective individuals are of their own choice, and everyone knows that only your own opinion is the one true opinion: You are entitled to your own opinion, but your still wrong. Linux Zealots are all about efficiency, You are entitled to my opinion. 

But what can you expect? Linus is probably the one that yells the loudest and so clearly has no real deep understanding of OS design, but it's ok, We are all entitled to his opinion. 

There are few distro's out there i have never touched at all, Gentoo was my favorite, but at work i get paid for things other than setting up my computer, and at home i don't want to f**k around that much, so i use Sabayon there. Don't get your hopes up, they may be popular, but they have a long way to go yet. It's amazing how their confidence of knowing the way to the perfect distro is capable of derailing them again and again.

At work i use Fedora, not because i like it (it's probably just less painful than *buntu) but because being born of Red Hat it works well with our Red Hat servers. For a quick and straight forward distro Slackware is the way to go, though recently they seem to have slipped behind badly. The latest release might turn things around ... but unless they provide full x86_64 support i'm not going back.

Just my 2 cents but at the end of the day, once you know either one of  Gentoo, Slackware or Debian well, you know linux. If you have a good understanding of their differences to each other as well as RedHat / Fedora / CentOS you know all that you need to do pretty much anything with the OS itself. Course, no distro is the same, that would just make things too easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:) you forgot distro  which is teh b3st3r3st evva 4real!!</p>
<p>truly amazing how protective individuals are of their own choice, and everyone knows that only your own opinion is the one true opinion: You are entitled to your own opinion, but your still wrong. Linux Zealots are all about efficiency, You are entitled to my opinion. </p>
<p>But what can you expect? Linus is probably the one that yells the loudest and so clearly has no real deep understanding of OS design, but it&#8217;s ok, We are all entitled to his opinion. </p>
<p>There are few distro&#8217;s out there i have never touched at all, Gentoo was my favorite, but at work i get paid for things other than setting up my computer, and at home i don&#8217;t want to f**k around that much, so i use Sabayon there. Don&#8217;t get your hopes up, they may be popular, but they have a long way to go yet. It&#8217;s amazing how their confidence of knowing the way to the perfect distro is capable of derailing them again and again.</p>
<p>At work i use Fedora, not because i like it (it&#8217;s probably just less painful than *buntu) but because being born of Red Hat it works well with our Red Hat servers. For a quick and straight forward distro Slackware is the way to go, though recently they seem to have slipped behind badly. The latest release might turn things around &#8230; but unless they provide full x86_64 support i&#8217;m not going back.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents but at the end of the day, once you know either one of  Gentoo, Slackware or Debian well, you know linux. If you have a good understanding of their differences to each other as well as RedHat / Fedora / CentOS you know all that you need to do pretty much anything with the OS itself. Course, no distro is the same, that would just make things too easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title linux users are all crazy fundamentalists. Thanks for informative article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly what I expected to find out after reading the title linux users are all crazy fundamentalists. Thanks for informative article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mailer</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>As I said, if people reasonably want help, I am more than happy to help them. But when, basically, they are selfish, whining, idiotic free-riders whose main recreation seems to be to bemoan the community they've chosen - bizarrely - to join, then why in God's name would anybody want to help them?

Go on about "zealotry" all you want, and mock conviction and principle. But, actually, as we enter the communication age, those who sacrifice their freedom for a contingent expediency *are* reflecting the very worst complacency that the human condition has to offer. Because it's related to software, it's easy to trivialise and to miss the grander point. Increasingly, software mediates almost every moment of our existence; whether the majority will remain serfs in this new world is a crucial question of modern ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, if people reasonably want help, I am more than happy to help them. But when, basically, they are selfish, whining, idiotic free-riders whose main recreation seems to be to bemoan the community they&#8217;ve chosen - bizarrely - to join, then why in God&#8217;s name would anybody want to help them?</p>
<p>Go on about &#8220;zealotry&#8221; all you want, and mock conviction and principle. But, actually, as we enter the communication age, those who sacrifice their freedom for a contingent expediency *are* reflecting the very worst complacency that the human condition has to offer. Because it&#8217;s related to software, it&#8217;s easy to trivialise and to miss the grander point. Increasingly, software mediates almost every moment of our existence; whether the majority will remain serfs in this new world is a crucial question of modern ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephemeriis</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephemeriis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>While I won't disagree with the content of your post (some Linux users are, indeed, crazy) it's pretty obvious you went to the wrong place for your information.  It looks like the kind of crazy ranting you'd see in an &lt;a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ask Slashdot&lt;/a&gt; article.  If you're looking for more helpful information there are some great websites out there like &lt;a href="http://distrowatch.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Distro Watch&lt;/a&gt; that are relatively unbiased and objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I won&#8217;t disagree with the content of your post (some Linux users are, indeed, crazy) it&#8217;s pretty obvious you went to the wrong place for your information.  It looks like the kind of crazy ranting you&#8217;d see in an <a href="http://ask.slashdot.org/" rel="nofollow">Ask Slashdot</a> article.  If you&#8217;re looking for more helpful information there are some great websites out there like <a href="http://distrowatch.com/" rel="nofollow">Distro Watch</a> that are relatively unbiased and objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: English Education Professor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Which Open Source OS is Right for You?</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>English Education Professor &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Which Open Source OS is Right for You?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] Link to command line idiot » Blog Archive » linux users are all crazy fundamentalists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link to command line idiot » Blog Archive » linux users are all crazy fundamentalists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Nick Mailer - thanks for proving the point.  Now take that $20 you were going to spend at Fuckhats'R'Us and go get a blowjob.  Seriously.  Then come back and have a Coke and a smile with the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick Mailer - thanks for proving the point.  Now take that $20 you were going to spend at Fuckhats&#8217;R'Us and go get a blowjob.  Seriously.  Then come back and have a Coke and a smile with the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 03:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I don't particularly disagree with any of the humorous points you mention. However, the grizzle at the end was too much. If you spent all this time writing up a rant, why didn't you also write the plain comparison that you so wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t particularly disagree with any of the humorous points you mention. However, the grizzle at the end was too much. If you spent all this time writing up a rant, why didn&#8217;t you also write the plain comparison that you so wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxManScot</title>
		<link>http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxManScot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commandlineidiot.com/blog/2007/linux-users-are-all-crazy-fundamentalists/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Its more about the kernel some distros offer more support but there all basically the same they just have different base packages but all packages are able to go other distros as long as you have the dependencies figured out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its more about the kernel some distros offer more support but there all basically the same they just have different base packages but all packages are able to go other distros as long as you have the dependencies figured out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
